What can I say? More and more problems.

With the naming of Britain’s new aircraft aircraft carrier HMS Queen Elizabeth today by the Queen herself, this news doesn’t look good. The ship was hailed “HMS Queen Elizabeth will be a national instrument of power and a national symbol of authority,” the First Sea Lord said in a speech.

“That means she will be a national icon too, all the while keeping the great in Great Britain and the royal in Royal Navy.”

I’m sorry but where do the ’40 jets’ they say it will carry be coming from? Yet again the folly of politicians is shown in crass decisions made in a hurry without proper examination.

WASHINGTON — The European debut of the Lockheed Martin F-35 joint strike fighter is now in question after the Pentagon grounded the entire fleet late Thursday based on the initial findings of an investigation into a fire that broke out on one of the jets last month.
The US Defense Department says it is still making preparations to send the jet to the Farnborough International Airshow and Royal International Air Tattoo in the UK, but would not make a final decision until “early next week.”

The Pentagon says it is still investigating the cause of the June 23 fire the broke out in the rear of an Air Force F-35 during takeoff at Eglin Air Force Base in Florida.

DoD temporarily grounded the F-35 fleet and ordered inspections of all jets before returning the aircraft to flight testing.

“The root cause of the incident remains under investigation,” DoD said in emailed statement late Thursday.

“Additional inspections of F-35 engines have been ordered, and return to flight will be determined based on inspection results and analysis of engineering data,” the statement reads. “Defense Department leadership supports this prudent approach.”

“We are working closely with the Air Force Safety Investigation Board to determine root cause and to inspect all engines in the fleet,” Pratt & Whitney spokesman Matthew Bates said in a company statement. “Safety is our top priority. Since the incident is the subject of an investigation it is inappropriate to comment further.”

A spokesman for Lockheed was not immediately available for comment. ■

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “What can I say? More and more problems.

  1. George Stephenson

    The F35 is not based on the Hawker Harrier in any way. The massive divergence from the original Shorts researched concept is the root of all its flaws including digging up concrete.

    Reply
    1. cliverh Post author

      Indeed George, the whole concept of the Harrier is simplicity with all four vectored thrust exhausts being utilised all the time. The F35 however carries ‘dead weight’ in the form of the scorpion tail and forward fan which is only utilised in VTOL.

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s